[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231026071032.GI3803936@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 09:10:32 +0200
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] regulator: dt-bindings: whitelist
system-critical-regulator property for fixed-regulator
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 01:41:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:46:11AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > Allow fixed-regulator to be marked as system-critical by whitelisting
> > the 'system-critical-regulator' property.
> >
> > This property indicating that the fixed-regulator is critical to system
> > stability or functionality, aligning with the recent changes in the
> > regulator core handling of under-voltage events for system-critical
> > regulators.
>
> Why would this need to be something we explicitly enable for a given
> regulator? Surely this is a property of the creativity of hardware
> engineers rather than the regulator itself.
:)
> Also please avoid the use of the outdated terms whitelist and blacklist,
> pass and block lists are often a good alternative.
ack
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists