linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] firmware_loader: Abort new fw load request once firmware core knows about reboot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 20:04:07 +0530
From:   Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
CC:     <russell.h.weight@...el.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <rafael@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] firmware_loader: Abort new fw load request once
 firmware core knows about reboot



On 10/23/2023 9:45 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:11:18PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
>> However, if you think we should rename this
>> 'only_kill_custom' to something like its inverse 'kill_all' and reverse the
>> below check to be more meaningful now ?
>>
>>     		if (kill_all || !fw_priv->need_uevent)
> 
> This seems like a better approach to make the intent clear and avoid
> future confusion.

Thanks, have sent it here.

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1698330459-31776-1-git-send-email-quic_mojha@quicinc.com/

-Mukesh

> 
>    Luis