[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7704b2a-29ab-b538-5b95-d72cc3993eb2@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 10:54:47 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, rppt@...nel.org,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
Aithal Srikanth <sraithal@....com>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
Sapkal Swapnil <Swapnil.Sapkal@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 0/1] sched/numa: Fix mm numa_scan_seq based
unconditional scan
On 10/20/2023 9:27 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> NUMA balancing code that updates PTEs by allowing unconditional scan
> based on the value of processes' mm numa_scan_seq is not perfect.
>
> More description is in patch1.
>
> Have used the below patch to identify the corner case.
>
> Detailed Result: (Only part of the result is updated
> in patch1 to save space in commit log)
>
Gentle ping to check if there are any concerns / comments
on the patch :)
Thanks and Regards
- Raghu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists