linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V1 1/1] sched/numa: Fix mm numa_scan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231101092101.i562axvfqjdvw2rx@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2023 09:21:01 +0000
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:     Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, rppt@...nel.org,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        Aithal Srikanth <sraithal@....com>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Sapkal Swapnil <Swapnil.Sapkal@....com>,
        K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/1] sched/numa: Fix mm numa_scan_seq based
 unconditional scan

On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:27:46PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> Since commit fc137c0ddab2 ("sched/numa: enhance vma scanning logic")
> 
> NUMA Balancing allows updating PTEs to trap NUMA hinting faults if the
> task had previously accessed VMA. However unconditional scan of VMAs are
> allowed during initial phase of VMA creation until process's
> mm numa_scan_seq reaches 2 even though current task had not accessed VMA.
> 
> Rationale:
>  - Without initial scan subsequent PTE update may never happen.
>  - Give fair opportunity to all the VMAs to be scanned and subsequently
> understand the access pattern of all the VMAs.
> 
> But it has a corner case where, if a VMA is created after some time,
> process's mm numa_scan_seq could be already greater than 2.
> 
> For e.g., values of mm numa_scan_seq when VMAs are created by running
> mmtest autonuma benchmark briefly looks like:
> start_seq=0 : 459
> start_seq=2 : 138
> start_seq=3 : 144
> start_seq=4 : 8
> start_seq=8 : 1
> start_seq=9 : 1
> This results in no unconditional PTE updates for those VMAs created after
> some time.
> 
> Fix:
> - Note down the initial value of mm numa_scan_seq in per VMA start_seq.
> - Allow unconditional scan till start_seq + 2.
> 
> Result:
> SUT: AMD EPYC Milan with 2 NUMA nodes 256 cpus.
> base kernel: upstream 6.6-rc6 with Mels patches [1] applied.
> 
> kernbench
> ==========		base                  patched %gain
> Amean    elsp-128      165.09 ( 0.00%)      164.78 *   0.19%*
> 
> Duration User       41404.28    41375.08
> Duration System      9862.22     9768.48
> Duration Elapsed      519.87      518.72
> 
> Ops NUMA PTE updates           1041416.00      831536.00
> Ops NUMA hint faults            263296.00      220966.00
> Ops NUMA pages migrated         258021.00      212769.00
> Ops AutoNUMA cost                 1328.67        1114.69
> 
> autonumabench
> 
> NUMA01_THREADLOCAL
> ==================
> Amean  elsp-NUMA01_THREADLOCAL   81.79 (0.00%)  67.74 *  17.18%*
> 
> Duration User       54832.73    47379.67
> Duration System        75.00      185.75
> Duration Elapsed      576.72      476.09
> 
> Ops NUMA PTE updates                  394429.00    11121044.00
> Ops NUMA hint faults                    1001.00     8906404.00
> Ops NUMA pages migrated                  288.00     2998694.00
> Ops AutoNUMA cost                          7.77       44666.84
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ZSXF3AFZgIld1meX@gmail.com/T/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@....com>

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs