[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57e8138250304f5b9701867949b9ee04@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 07:24:44 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 1/3] math.h: add DIV_ROUND_UP_NO_OVERFLOW
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 26 October 2023 17:54
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] math.h: add DIV_ROUND_UP_NO_OVERFLOW
>
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 22:57, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't that version end up calling inline functions?
> > So won't be usable in static initialisers - the same as statement functions.
>
> David, please either read what I write, or actually test things out,
> instead of just adding noise.
I do test a lot of stuff.
For some reason I'd assumed that you would be able to
have a call to a function inside a static initialiser.
Clearly not enough coffee :-(
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists