[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H5bCmF6Tcjg_fMBwQTRne3h2Zr+PpBZMt_KCZNzot-i4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:40:09 +0800
From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Huang Pei <huangpei@...ngson.cn>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] LoongArch: Add RSEQ_SIG break code definition
Hi, Mathieu,
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 2:16 AM Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023-10-26 07:44, Huang Pei wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Pei <huangpei@...ngson.cn>
> > ---
> > arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/break.h | 2 ++
>
> Why is this part of the uapi ? None of the other architecture has this
> as part of uapi. It's only defined in the rseq selftest arch-specific
> header file.
>From my point of view, it makes sense to list the dedicated break code
in UAPI. It is harmless and can avoid potential conflict in future.
Huacai
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/break.h b/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/break.h
> > index bb9b82ba59f2..e0fcfc304834 100644
> > --- a/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/break.h
> > +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/break.h
> > @@ -20,4 +20,6 @@
> > #define BRK_UPROBE_BP 12 /* See <asm/uprobes.h> */
> > #define BRK_UPROBE_XOLBP 13 /* See <asm/uprobes.h> */
> >
> > +#define BRK_RSEQ_SIG 16 /* See rseq */
> > +
> > #endif /* __UAPI_ASM_BREAK_H */
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> https://www.efficios.com
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists