linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8939: Add missing CSI2 related clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e44c751a-f0f5-42d8-aa99-743b349fdf9b@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 28 Oct 2023 20:13:26 +0100
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@...loo.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: gcc-msm8939: Add missing CSI2 related clocks

On 28/10/2023 13:10, Vincent Knecht wrote:
> When adding in the indexes for this clock-controller we missed
> GCC_CAMSS_CSI2_AHB_CLK, GCC_CAMSS_CSI2_CLK, GCC_CAMSS_CSI2PHY_CLK,
> GCC_CAMSS_CSI2PIX_CLK and GCC_CAMSS_CSI2RDI_CLK.
> 
> Add them in now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Knecht <vincent.knecht@...loo.org>
> ---
> No fixes tag because camss is a not-yet-enabled feature for msm8939.
> 
> Also didn't rename ftbl_gcc_camss_csi0_1_clk now that csi2 uses it
> to avoid not-required-churn... should it be done anyway ?

An aesthetic choice with no right answer but, downstream calls it

ftbl_gcc_camss_csi0_1_2_clk,

maybe that's reasonable.

Assuming Krz's comments acted upon.

Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>