linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: watchdog: davinci-wdt: convert txt to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231029150905.108531-1-n2h9z4@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:09:05 +0100
From:   Nik Bune <n2h9z4@...il.com>
To:     krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        afd@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        n2h9z4@...il.com, skhan@...uxfoundation.org, wim@...ux-watchdog.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: watchdog: davinci-wdt: convert txt to yaml

Hello! 

>On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 08:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>On 28/10/2023 19:51, Nik Bune wrote:
>>>> +  power-domains:
>>>> +    description:
>>>> +      A phandle and PM domain specifier as defined by bindings of
>>>> +      the power controller specified by phandle.
>>>> +      See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml for details.
>>>
>>> I think you missed Rob's comment in reply to Andrew, about constraining
>>> and ordering the power-domains:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231026203037.GA327324-robh@kernel.org/
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Conor.
>>
>> I didn't get what should be done with respect to the comment above:
>> Should we wait for the response from Andrew,
>> or should we skip and remove the the power-domains definition for this binding,
>> or add "maxItems: 1" to power-domains definition?
>
>None of the options above allow to send the same code without maxItems.
>Sending new version without addressing feedback is basically ignoring
>the feedback and next time you will have annoyed reviewers...
>
>Best regards,
>Krzysztof
>

I didn't ignore. v3 patch was sent 37 minutes before the Rob's comment to v2. 

Kind regards, Nik.