linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: watchdog: davinci-wdt: convert txt to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <147aebc9-8d76-49d4-a80f-eb6894868688@linaro.org>
Date:   Sun, 29 Oct 2023 08:31:33 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Nik Bune <n2h9z4@...il.com>, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, afd@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        wim@...ux-watchdog.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: watchdog: davinci-wdt: convert txt to
 yaml

On 28/10/2023 19:51, Nik Bune wrote:
>>> +  power-domains:
>>> +    description:
>>> +      A phandle and PM domain specifier as defined by bindings of
>>> +      the power controller specified by phandle.
>>> +      See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power-domain.yaml for details.
>>
>> I think you missed Rob's comment in reply to Andrew, about constraining
>> and ordering the power-domains:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231026203037.GA327324-robh@kernel.org/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Conor.
> 
> I didn't get what should be done with respect to the comment above:
> Should we wait for the response from Andrew, 
> or should we skip and remove the the power-domains definition for this binding, 
> or add "maxItems: 1" to power-domains definition?

None of the options above allow to send the same code without maxItems.
Sending new version without addressing feedback is basically ignoring
the feedback and next time you will have annoyed reviewers...

Best regards,
Krzysztof