linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 03/11] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: added nxp secure enclave firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 18:52:03 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, clin@...e.com,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, pierre.gondois@....com, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, davem@...emloft.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gaurav.jain@....com,
        alexander.stein@...tq-group.com, V.Sethi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/11] arm64: dts: imx8ulp-evk: added nxp secure
 enclave firmware

On 30/10/2023 10:58, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> Added support for NXP secure enclave called EdgeLock Enclave
> firmware (se-fw) for imx8ulp-evk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi | 10 +++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> index 946f2b68d16f..7b66de3a392d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8ulp.dtsi
> @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ sosc: clock-sosc {
>  		#clock-cells = <0>;
>  	};
>  
> -	sram@...1f000 {
> +	sram0: sram@...1f000 {
>  		compatible = "mmio-sram";
>  		reg = <0x0 0x2201f000 0x0 0x1000>;
>  
> @@ -578,4 +578,12 @@ gpiod: gpio@...00080 {
>  			gpio-ranges = <&iomuxc1 0 0 24>;
>  		};
>  	};
> +
> +	ele_fw2: se-fw2 {

Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation


Best regards,
Krzysztof