linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: added nxp secure enclave fw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 18:52:34 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, clin@...e.com,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, pierre.gondois@....com, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, davem@...emloft.net, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gaurav.jain@....com,
        alexander.stein@...tq-group.com, V.Sethi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/11] arm64: dts: imx93-11x11-evk: added nxp secure
 enclave fw

On 30/10/2023 10:58, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> Added support for NXP secure enclave called EdgeLock Enclave
> firmware (se-fw) for imx93-11x11-evk.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@....com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi | 8 +++++++-
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
> index dcf6e4846ac9..197de680fd27 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
>  /*
> - * Copyright 2022 NXP
> + * Copyright 2022-2023 NXP
>   */
>  
>  #include <dt-bindings/clock/imx93-clock.h>
> @@ -925,4 +925,10 @@ ddr-pmu@...00dc0 {
>  			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 90 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>  		};
>  	};
> +
> +	ele_fw2: se-fw2 {

Node names should be generic. See also an explanation and list of
examples (not exhaustive) in DT specification:
https://devicetree-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/chapter2-devicetree-basics.html#generic-names-recommendation

Why do you even need label?

Best regards,
Krzysztof