linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/21] PCI: MSI: Add helper function to set system wide MSI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZT/t0UY5rbudhjfH@sunil-laptop>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 23:24:25 +0530
From:   Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>,
        Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@...osinc.com>,
        Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/21] PCI: MSI: Add helper function to set system
 wide MSI support

On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 03:28:53PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26 2023 at 01:53, Sunil V. L. wrote:
> > Like pci_no_msi() used to disable MSI support, add a function to enable
> > system wide MSI support.
> 
> Why?
> 
> int pci_msi_enable = 1;
> 
> So this function makes it more one or what am I missing here?
> 
Hi Thomas,

Just noting related discussion :
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-serial/msg57616.html

The MSI controller on RISC-V (IMSIC) is optional for the platform. So,
when by default pci_msi_enable = 1 and the MSI controller is not
discovered, we get stack trace like below.

[    0.608941] [<ffffffff804d0400>] pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs+0x18/0x34
[    0.608991] [<ffffffff804cfe04>] msix_capability_init+0x228/0x406
[    0.609001] [<ffffffff804cfbc6>] __pci_enable_msix_range+0x1b4/0x1ca
[    0.609011] [<ffffffff804ce8c2>]
pci_alloc_irq_vectors_affinity+0x6e/0xee
[    0.609020] [<ffffffff8055015c>] vp_find_vqs_msix+0xfa/0x350
[    0.609031] [<ffffffff8054ff54>] vp_find_vqs+0x36/0x144
[    0.609040] [<ffffffff8054f7b8>] vp_modern_find_vqs+0x14/0x48
[    0.609049] [<ffffffff8064d3fc>] init_vqs+0x362/0x4ee
[    0.609058] [<ffffffff8064c8be>] virtnet_probe+0x672/0xa70
[    0.609067] [<ffffffff80549d38>] virtio_dev_probe+0x194/0x200
[    0.609075] [<ffffffff805afb52>] really_probe+0x106/0x28a
[    0.609083] [<ffffffff805aefda>] __driver_probe_device+0x62/0xdc
[    0.609091] [<ffffffff805af920>] driver_probe_device+0x38/0x164
[    0.609098] [<ffffffff805af146>] __driver_attach+0xd0/0x17c
[    0.609106] [<ffffffff805ac6e2>] bus_for_each_dev+0xd0/0x11c
[    0.609116] [<ffffffff805af06e>] driver_attach+0x1a/0x22
[    0.609123] [<ffffffff805ace06>] bus_add_driver+0x136/0x208
[    0.609132] [<ffffffff805b044e>] driver_register+0x48/0xda
[    0.609140] [<ffffffff80549594>] register_virtio_driver+0x20/0x2a
[    0.609157] [<ffffffff80a3060e>] virtio_net_driver_init+0x76/0xa6
[    0.609168] [<ffffffff800020ec>] do_one_initcall+0xc0/0x21e
[    0.609176] [<ffffffff80a00f68>] do_initcall_level+0x7c/0x8e
[    0.609186] [<ffffffff80a00eb6>] do_initcalls+0x52/0x88
[    0.609195] [<ffffffff80a00e5c>] do_basic_setup+0x1c/0x24
[    0.609204] [<ffffffff80a00e00>] kernel_init_freeable+0xe2/0x122
[    0.609213] [<ffffffff8090beb4>] kernel_init+0x1a/0x18e
[    0.609223] [<ffffffff8000383e>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x1c

So, what I did was, by default call pci_no_msi() to disable MSI and then
call pci_set_msi() to enable when MSI controller is probed.

But I think Bjorn's suggestion to depend on PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI may be
better idea. In that case, we need to set bridge->msi_domain to true in
pci_create_root_bus(). Let me know what do you prefer or if I am
completely missing something here.

Thanks,
Sunil