[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b20a1cf2-445b-493e-9c49-25cf854d429b@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 09:50:59 +0530
From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: clock: ipq5332: drop the few nss clocks
definition
On 10/31/2023 12:26 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Kathiravan Thirumoorthy (2023-10-30 02:47:17)
>> gcc_snoc_nssnoc_clk, gcc_snoc_nssnoc_1_clk, gcc_nssnoc_nsscc_clk are
>> enabled by default and it's RCG is properly configured by bootloader.
>>
>> Some of the NSS clocks needs these clocks to be enabled. To avoid
>> these clocks being disabled by clock framework, drop these entries.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <quic_kathirav@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>
> Instead of this patch just drop the clks from the table and enable the
> clks during probe with register writes.
Thanks for the suggestion Stephen, will handle this way in V2. Between,
I think still the entries in the dt-bindings can be dropped along with
the entries in the clock table?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists