linux-kernel - Re: [RFC bpf-next 5/6] bpf: selftests: test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZWFfJFpp6UvYNj-i5PFU42rUD_U4B0c_Qa7DYV0Rme=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2023 23:25:55 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc:     ast@...nel.org, andrii@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
        antony.antony@...unet.com, mykolal@...com, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
        song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com, haoluo@...gle.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...ux-ipsec.org
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 5/6] bpf: selftests: test_tunnel: Disable CO-RE relocations

On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 4:22 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:33:09PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:46 AM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
> > >
> > > Switching to vmlinux.h definitions seems to make the verifier very
> > > unhappy with bitfield accesses. The error is:
> > >
> > >     ; md.u.md2.dir = direction;
> > >     33: (69) r1 = *(u16 *)(r2 +11)
> > >     misaligned stack access off (0x0; 0x0)+-64+11 size 2
> > >
> > > It looks like disabling CO-RE relocations seem to make the error go
> > > away.
> > >
> >
> > for accessing bitfields libbpf provides
> > BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD_PROBED() and BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() macros
>
> In this case the code in question is:
>
>         __u8 direction = 0;
>         md.u.md2.dir = direction;
>
> IOW the problem is assigning to bitfields, not reading from them.
>
> Is that something that libbpf needs to support as well?

Ah, I missed that this is a write into a struct. I think we can
support BPF_CORE_WRITE_BITFIELD() (not the PROBED version, though)
using all the same CO-RE relocations. It's probably a very niche case,
but BPF_CORE_READ_BITFIELD() is niche as well (though an absolute
necessity when the need does come up).

>
> Thanks,
> Daniel