[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKCNFxcpE9Y250iwd8E4+t_Pror0AuRaoRYepUkXj56UA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 20:54:56 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@...ts.linux.dev>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: fix compilation error without CGROUPS
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 10:05 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 04:49:34PM +0100, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> > Our MPTCP CI complained [1] -- and KBuild too -- that it was no longer
> > possible to build the kernel without CONFIG_CGROUPS:
> >
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_new':
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > 919 | case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:36: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > 919 | case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:927:60: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct css_task_iter'
> > 927 | kit->css_it = bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_ma, sizeof(struct css_task_iter));
> > | ^~~~~~
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:930:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_start'; did you mean 'task_seq_start'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 930 | css_task_iter_start(css, flags, kit->css_it);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | task_seq_start
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_next':
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_next'; did you mean 'class_dev_iter_next'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 940 | return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > | class_dev_iter_next
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct task_struct *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
> > 940 | return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_destroy':
> > kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:949:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_end' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 949 | css_task_iter_end(kit->css_it);
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > This patch simply surrounds with a #ifdef the new code requiring CGroups
> > support. It seems enough for the compiler and this is similar to
> > bpf_iter_css_{new,next,destroy}() functions where no other #ifdef have
> > been added in kernel/bpf/helpers.c and in the selftests.
> >
> > Fixes: 9c66dc94b62a ("bpf: Introduce css_task open-coded iterator kfuncs")
> > Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/6665206927
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310260528.aHWgVFqq-lkp@intel.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@...nel.org>
>
> Acked/Tested-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
I believe this patch has the same issue as Arnd's patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAADnVQL-zoFPPOVu3nM981gKxRu7Q3G3LTRsKstJEeahpoR1RQ@mail.gmail.com/
I'd like to merge the fix asap. Please make it a complete fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists