[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <211ac705-5972-9b39-73f1-a608e65b6de3@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 14:51:19 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: chengming.zhou@...ux.dev, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
willy@...radead.org
Cc: rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 9/9] slub: Update frozen slabs documentations in
the source
On 10/31/23 15:07, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev wrote:
> From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
>
> The current updated scheme (which this series implemented) is:
> - node partial slabs: PG_Workingset && !frozen
> - cpu partial slabs: !PG_Workingset && !frozen
> - cpu slabs: !PG_Workingset && frozen
> - full slabs: !PG_Workingset && !frozen
It could be useful to put this also to the initial comment description.
Towards the end of the comment, there's a block explaining
"slab->frozen". It could be extended to cover all 4 combination (but not
all of them need such long explanation).
>
> The most important change is that "frozen" bit is not set for the
> cpu partial slabs anymore, __slab_free() will grab node list_lock
> then check by !PG_Workingset that it's not on a node partial list.
>
> And the "frozen" bit is still kept for the cpu slabs for performance,
> since we don't need to grab node list_lock to check whether the
> PG_Workingset is set or not if the "frozen" bit is set in __slab_free().
>
> Update related documentations and comments in the source.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index bb7368047103..89d3f7a18a73 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -76,13 +76,22 @@
> *
> * Frozen slabs
> *
> - * If a slab is frozen then it is exempt from list management. It is not
> - * on any list except per cpu partial list. The processor that froze the
> + * If a slab is frozen then it is exempt from list management. It is
> + * the cpu slab which is actively allocated from by the processor that
> + * froze it and it is not on any list. The processor that froze the
> * slab is the one who can perform list operations on the slab. Other
> * processors may put objects onto the freelist but the processor that
> * froze the slab is the only one that can retrieve the objects from the
> * slab's freelist.
> *
> + * CPU partial slabs
> + *
> + * The partially empty slabs cached on the CPU partial list are used
> + * for performance reasons, which speeds up the allocation process.
> + * These slabs are not frozen, but also exempt from list management,
^ are also
(otherwise somebody could read it as "also are not")
> + * by clearing the PG_workingset flag when moving out of the node
> + * partial list. Please see __slab_free() for more details.
> + *
> * list_lock
> *
> * The list_lock protects the partial and full list on each node and
> @@ -2620,8 +2629,7 @@ static void put_partials_cpu(struct kmem_cache *s,
> }
>
> /*
> - * Put a slab that was just frozen (in __slab_free|get_partial_node) into a
> - * partial slab slot if available.
> + * Put a slab into a partial slab slot if available.
> *
> * If we did not find a slot then simply move all the partials to the
> * per node partial list.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists