linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] rootfs: Use tmpfs for rootfs even if root= is given

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023110159-rasping-stature-af8d@gregkh>
Date:   Wed, 1 Nov 2023 15:28:00 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Milton D. Miller II" <mdmii@...look.com>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rootfs: Use tmpfs for rootfs even if root= is given

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:16:37AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/1/23 07:35, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On 10/31/23 11:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:44:17AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > rootfs currently does not use tmpfs if the root= boot option is passed
> > > > even though the documentation about rootfs (added in 6e19eded3684) in
> > > > Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.rst states:
> > > > 
> > > >    If CONFIG_TMPFS is enabled, rootfs will use tmpfs instead of ramfs by
> > > >    default.  To force ramfs, add "rootfstype=ramfs" to the kernel command
> > > >    line.
> > > 
> > > At this point in time, is there even any difference between ramfs and
> > > tmpfs anymore?  Why would you want to choose one over the other here?
> > 
> > I submitted a patch to fix this to the list multiple times, which got ignored as
> > always. Most recently here:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8244c75f-445e-b15b-9dbf-266e7ca666e2@landley.net/
> 
> Everyone,
> I now responded to Rob's patch over here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/11/1/333

Note, we can't do anything with lkml.org links, they don't even work at
times, please always use lore.kernel.org

Also, one patch out of a longer series also will not work as we can't
pick it up from there either.

Can someone resend it, as a stand-alone patch, with the proper people
 cc:ed and then we can handle that.  You all know this...

 thanks,

 greg k-h

> 
> 
> > 
> > Rob