[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa0074d1f0e33dc6f50e4f71a8fb7a19d319e96c.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2023 10:31:13 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Milton D. Miller II" <mdmii@...look.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rootfs: Use tmpfs for rootfs even if root= is given
On Wed, 2023-11-01 at 15:28 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 10:16:37AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 11/1/23 07:35, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On 10/31/23 11:56, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 11:44:17AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > > > > rootfs currently does not use tmpfs if the root= boot option is passed
> > > > > even though the documentation about rootfs (added in 6e19eded3684) in
> > > > > Documentation/filesystems/ramfs-rootfs-initramfs.rst states:
> > > > >
> > > > > If CONFIG_TMPFS is enabled, rootfs will use tmpfs instead of ramfs by
> > > > > default. To force ramfs, add "rootfstype=ramfs" to the kernel command
> > > > > line.
> > > >
> > > > At this point in time, is there even any difference between ramfs and
> > > > tmpfs anymore? Why would you want to choose one over the other here?
> > >
> > > I submitted a patch to fix this to the list multiple times, which got ignored as
> > > always. Most recently here:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/8244c75f-445e-b15b-9dbf-266e7ca666e2@landley.net/
> >
> > Everyone,
> > I now responded to Rob's patch over here:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2023/11/1/333
>
> Note, we can't do anything with lkml.org links, they don't even work at
> times, please always use lore.kernel.org
>
> Also, one patch out of a longer series also will not work as we can't
> pick it up from there either.
>
> Can someone resend it, as a stand-alone patch, with the proper people
> cc:ed and then we can handle that. You all know this...
The initramfs@...r.kernel.org mailing list should be Cc'ed as well.
--
thanks,
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists