linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] platform/x86: intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update: Use bus-based WMI interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <929f2e54-0778-4376-8cd7-8e1b906924fb@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:49:29 -0700
From:   "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>
To:     Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, <maurice.ma@...el.com>,
        <hdegoede@...hat.com>, <markgross@...nel.org>,
        <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com>,
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] platform/x86: intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update: Use bus-based
 WMI interface



On 11/1/2023 9:29 PM, Armin Wolf wrote:
> Currently, the driver was still using the deprecated GUID-based
> interface to query/set data blocks. Use the modern bus-based
> interface for this.
> 
> Tested with a custom SSDT from the Intel Slim Bootloader project.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c | 13 ++++---------
>  drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c                     |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c
> index 3c86e0108a24..9cf5ed0f8dc2 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/wmi/sbl-fw-update.c
> @@ -25,18 +25,13 @@
> 
>  static int get_fwu_request(struct device *dev, u32 *out)
>  {
> -	struct acpi_buffer result = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
>  	union acpi_object *obj;
> -	acpi_status status;
> 
> -	status = wmi_query_block(INTEL_WMI_SBL_GUID, 0, &result);
> -	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "wmi_query_block failed\n");
> +	obj = wmidev_block_query(to_wmi_device(dev), 0);
> +	if (!obj)
>  		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> 
> -	obj = (union acpi_object *)result.pointer;
> -	if (!obj || obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
> +	if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
>  		dev_warn(dev, "wmi_query_block returned invalid value\n");
>  		kfree(obj);
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -58,7 +53,7 @@ static int set_fwu_request(struct device *dev, u32 in)
>  	input.length = sizeof(u32);
>  	input.pointer = &value;
> 
> -	status = wmi_set_block(INTEL_WMI_SBL_GUID, 0, &input);
> +	status = wmidev_block_set(to_wmi_device(dev), 0, &input);
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "wmi_set_block failed\n");
>  		return -ENODEV;
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> index 9d9a050e7086..4c4effc883ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, wmi_device_ids);
>  static const char * const allow_duplicates[] = {
>  	"05901221-D566-11D1-B2F0-00A0C9062910",	/* wmi-bmof */
>  	"8A42EA14-4F2A-FD45-6422-0087F7A7E608",	/* dell-wmi-ddv */
> +	"44FADEB1-B204-40F2-8581-394BBDC1B651",	/* intel-wmi-sbl-fw-update */
>  	NULL
>  };
> 

sbl driver specific changes looks okay to me
Reviewed-by: Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>

Jithu