lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0c87ab95-1727-4a02-92a3-3e0a14f5b715@intel.com> Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 12:08:12 -0700 From: "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com> To: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de>, <maurice.ma@...el.com>, <hdegoede@...hat.com>, <markgross@...nel.org>, <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com> CC: <Dell.Client.Kernel@...l.com>, <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] platform/x86: wmi: Add wmidev_block_set() On 11/1/2023 9:29 PM, Armin Wolf wrote: > Currently, WMI drivers have to use the deprecated GUID-based > interface when setting data blocks. This prevents those > drivers from fully moving away from this interface. > > Provide wmidev_block_set() so drivers using wmi_set_block() can > fully migrate to the modern bus-based interface. > > Tested with a custom SSDT from the Intel Slim Bootloader project. > > Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@....de> > --- > drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------ > include/linux/wmi.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) > I noticed that this patch doesn't apply ontop of the latest released tag (v6.6) (the other 3 applies) Just a minor suggestion : Perhaps a note on which tree/base-commit the patch would apply would be helpful for reviewers (After some digging around I found that the patch does indeed apply ontop of your patches submitted for the merge window) Jithu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists