lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 2 Nov 2023 11:45:37 +0000
From:   Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>
To:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michał Mirosław <emmir@...gle.com>,
        Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>,
        Danylo Mocherniuk <mdanylo@...gle.com>,
        Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@...driver.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Alex Sierra <alex.sierra@....com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v33 6/6] selftests: mm: add pagemap ioctl tests

On 21/08/2023 15:15, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:

[...]

> +
> +
> +int init_uffd(void)
> +{
> +	struct uffdio_api uffdio_api;
> +
> +	uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK | UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY);
> +	if (uffd == -1)
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("uffd syscall failed\n");
> +
> +	uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API;
> +	uffdio_api.features = UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED | UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC |
> +			      UFFD_FEATURE_WP_HUGETLBFS_SHMEM;
> +	if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_API, &uffdio_api))
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("UFFDIO_API\n");
> +
> +	if (!(uffdio_api.api & UFFDIO_REGISTER_MODE_WP) ||
> +	    !(uffdio_api.features & UFFD_FEATURE_WP_UNPOPULATED) ||
> +	    !(uffdio_api.features & UFFD_FEATURE_WP_ASYNC) ||
> +	    !(uffdio_api.features & UFFD_FEATURE_WP_HUGETLBFS_SHMEM))
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("UFFDIO_API error %llu\n", uffdio_api.api);

Hi,

I've just noticed that this fails on arm64 because the required features are not
available. It's common practice to skip instead of fail for this sort of
condition (and that's how all the other uffd tests work). The current fail
approach creates noise in our CI.

I see this is already in mm-stable so perhaps we can add a patch to fix on top?

Thanks,
Ryan


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ