[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUPfHhHOMqrBEFZZ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 19:40:46 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 01/15] drm/i915/dsi: assume BXT gpio works
for non-native GPIO
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 07:10:09PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 05:12:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > if (native)
> > icl_native_gpio_set_value(dev_priv, gpio_number, value);
> > else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 11)
> > - icl_exec_gpio(connector, gpio_source, gpio_index, value);
> > + bxt_exec_gpio(connector, gpio_source, gpio_index, value);
>
> We could just drop this whole branch since we end up in bxt_exec_gpio()
> in the end anyway. Or we drop the final else and make this one check for
> DISPLAY_VER >=9.
Looking at the code, I'm not sure how we can get rid of it, but the second
option is feasible.
> > else if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev_priv))
> > vlv_exec_gpio(connector, gpio_source, gpio_number, value);
> > else if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(dev_priv))
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists