| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202311040312.Tf6bTkw0-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2023 03:27:54 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/15] drm/i915/dsi: Replace poking of CHV GPIOs
behind the driver's back
Hi Andy,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on drm-intel/for-linux-next-fixes linus/master v6.6 next-20231103]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/drm-i915-dsi-assume-BXT-gpio-works-for-non-native-GPIO/20231103-064642
base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-intel for-linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102151228.668842-15-andriy.shevchenko%40linux.intel.com
patch subject: [PATCH v3 14/15] drm/i915/dsi: Replace poking of CHV GPIOs behind the driver's back
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231104/202311040312.Tf6bTkw0-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231104/202311040312.Tf6bTkw0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311040312.Tf6bTkw0-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:272:4: error: call to undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:03", "Panel SE",
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:275:4: error: call to undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:00", "Panel SW",
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:278:4: error: call to undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:02", "Panel E",
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:281:4: error: call to undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:01", "Panel N",
^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c:299:3: error: call to undeclared function 'soc_exec_opaque_gpio'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:01", "Panel N",
^
5 errors generated.
vim +/soc_exec_opaque_gpio +272 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dsi_vbt.c
263
264 static void chv_gpio_set_value(struct intel_connector *connector,
265 u8 gpio_source, u8 gpio_index, bool value)
266 {
267 struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->base.dev);
268
269 if (connector->panel.vbt.dsi.seq_version >= 3) {
270 if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SE) {
271 /* XXX: it's unclear whether 255->57 is part of SE. */
> 272 soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:03", "Panel SE",
273 gpio_index - CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW, value);
274 } else if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW) {
275 soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:00", "Panel SW",
276 gpio_index - CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_SW, value);
277 } else if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E) {
278 soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:02", "Panel E",
279 gpio_index - CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E, value);
280 } else {
281 soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:01", "Panel N",
282 gpio_index - CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_N, value);
283 }
284 } else {
285 /* XXX: The spec is unclear about CHV GPIO on seq v2 */
286 if (gpio_source != 0) {
287 drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
288 "unknown gpio source %u\n", gpio_source);
289 return;
290 }
291
292 if (gpio_index >= CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_E) {
293 drm_dbg_kms(&dev_priv->drm,
294 "invalid gpio index %u for GPIO N\n",
295 gpio_index);
296 return;
297 }
298
299 soc_exec_opaque_gpio(connector, gpio_index, "INT33FF:01", "Panel N",
300 gpio_index - CHV_GPIO_IDX_START_N, value);
301 }
302 }
303
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists