[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231103143657.0000046f@Huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:36:57 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
CC: <minyard@....org>, <openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <aladyshev22@...il.com>,
<jk@...econstruct.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] ipmi: kcs_bmc: Include spinlock.h
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 16:45:14 +1030
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au> wrote:
> struct kcs_bmc_device defines a spinlock member but the header in which
> it is defined failed to include the spinlock header. In the spirit of
> include-what-you-use, do what's necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>
This is fine, but whilst checking it I noticed there is no
forwards def of struct device or appropriate include.
Still that's unrelated
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.h b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.h
> index fa408b802c79..880d835fb90c 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/kcs_bmc.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #define __KCS_BMC_H__
>
> #include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
>
> #define KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_OBE BIT(0)
> #define KCS_BMC_EVENT_TYPE_IBF BIT(1)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists