linux-kernel - Re: Hash sha3-512 vs scripts/sign-file vs openssl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e76b6853-95e9-46b4-bc8a-ac10a1be2246@sapience.com>
Date:   Sun, 5 Nov 2023 17:45:53 -0500
From:   Genes Lists <lists@...ience.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
        dwmw2@...radead.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hash sha3-512 vs scripts/sign-file vs openssl

On 11/5/23 16:49, Genes Lists wrote:
> Mainline modules signing supports sha3-xxx.
> 
..
>   At main.c:321:
> - SSL error:2EFFF06F:CMS routines:CRYPTO_internal:ctrl failure: 
> cms/cms_sd.c:269
> 
> openssl version here on arch is 3.1.4 and this may quite possibly be 
..

I confirm that linking sign-file against openssl git head works fine.

So it should be fixed in openssl 3.2

regards,

gene