[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bkc8inps.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 09:55:11 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Fang Xiang <fangxiang3@...omi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Flush ITS tables before writing
GITS_BASER<n> registers in non-coherent GIC designs.
On Sat, Nov 04 2023 at 09:56, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 08:32:56 +0000,
> Fang Xiang <fangxiang3@...omi.com> wrote:
>>
>> In non-coherent GIC design, ITS tables should be clean and flushed
>> to the PoV of the ITS before writing GITS_BASER<n> registers, otherwise
>> the ITS would read dirty tables and lead to UNPREDICTABLE behaviors.
>>
>> The ITS always got clean tables in initialization with this fix, by
>> observing the signals from GIC.
>>
>> Furthermore, hoist the quirked non-shareable attributes earlier to
>> save effort in tables setup.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Fang Xiang <fangxiang3@...omi.com>
>> Tested-by: Fang Xiang <fangxiang3@...omi.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Shouldn't this have a Fixes tag? My guess is:
a8707f553884 ("irqchip/gic-v3: Add Rockchip 3588001 erratum workaround")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists