linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZUla6RAd3LMyHZ9G@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2023 22:30:17 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
        conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review

Hi!

> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> There seems to be a problem building for RISC-V with GCC 8, 12, and Clang 17. This is with defconfig, allnoconfig, tinyconfig:
> 
> -----8<-----
> /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: In function 'riscv_intc_init':
> /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c:119:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'fwnode_dev_initialized'; did you mean 'zone_is_initialized'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   119 |                 fwnode_dev_initialized(of_fwnode_handle(node), true);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                 zone_is_initialized
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:286: drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:503: drivers/irqchip] Error 2
> make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1832: drivers] Error 2
> make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
> make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> ----->8-----

We see same problems in our risc-v build:

https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/jobs/5468492319

> Currently bisecting.

Thank you!

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,        Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)