linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2023 12:14:21 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
        apatel@...tanamicro.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review

Hello!

On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:53, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 06/11/23 7:03 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> > There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >       https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> There seems to be a problem building for RISC-V with GCC 8, 12, and Clang 17. This is with defconfig, allnoconfig, tinyconfig:
>
> -----8<-----
> /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: In function 'riscv_intc_init':
> /builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c:119:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'fwnode_dev_initialized'; did you mean 'zone_is_initialized'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    119 |                 fwnode_dev_initialized(of_fwnode_handle(node), true);
>        |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>        |                 zone_is_initialized
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:286: drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.o] Error 1
> make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:503: drivers/irqchip] Error 2
> make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1832: drivers] Error 2
> make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
> make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
> ----->8-----
>
> Currently bisecting.

-----8<-----
Bisection done!
First commit presenting NEW behaviour: 6751b1fbf98ba2c40bbdda22e2e6714a9c27b91b

commit 6751b1fbf98ba2c40bbdda22e2e6714a9c27b91b
Author: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 3 10:13:51 2023 +0530

    irqchip/riscv-intc: Mark all INTC nodes as initialized

    [ Upstream commit e13cd66bd821be417c498a34928652db4ac6b436 ]
----->8-----

Reverting that commit makes the build happy again.

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org