linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8aec1bd5-befc-486c-9e47-7571b937b8c7@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2023 11:53:04 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/95] 5.10.200-rc1 review

Hello!

On 06/11/23 7:03 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.200 release.
> There are 95 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.200-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

There seems to be a problem building for RISC-V with GCC 8, 12, and Clang 17. This is with defconfig, allnoconfig, tinyconfig:

-----8<-----
/builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c: In function 'riscv_intc_init':
/builds/linux/drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c:119:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'fwnode_dev_initialized'; did you mean 'zone_is_initialized'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   119 |                 fwnode_dev_initialized(of_fwnode_handle(node), true);
       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
       |                 zone_is_initialized
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:286: drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.o] Error 1
make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:503: drivers/irqchip] Error 2
make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1832: drivers] Error 2
make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
make: *** [Makefile:192: __sub-make] Error 2
make: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
----->8-----

Currently bisecting.

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org