[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b3f7dc9-11ac-4eb2-8d51-4fc6a34a8951@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 21:03:52 +0530
From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
mizhang@...gle.com
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/128] 5.15.138-rc1 review
Hi Greg,
On 06/11/23 8:24 pm, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> On 06/11/23 6:32 pm, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.138 release.
>> There are 128 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:02:46 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>
> I am seeing a build failure with perf:
>
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c: In function evlist__add_aux_dummy:
> tools/perf/util/evlist.c:266:31: error: implicit declaration of function
> evlist__dummy_event; did you mean evlist__add_sb_event’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 266 | struct evsel *evsel = evlist__dummy_event(evlist);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | evlist__add_sb_event
>
>
> I think we should drop these three commits:
>
> 20a5799cae7dc perf evlist: Avoid frequency mode for the dummy event
> 7de783c81c7e7 perf tools: Get rid of evlist__add_on_all_cpus()
> 141ce9207068e perf evlist: Add evlist__add_dummy_on_all_cpus()
>
I have reverted these three commits locally and triggered the tests.
No problems seen on x86_64 and aarch64 with our testing.
Tested-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
Thanks,
Harshit
> Backport was requested here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CAL715WLTjMGQrhm6wWqFSeL_Oq-HzoQd5CqewvLRLv0Xbnibgw@mail.gmail.com/
>
>
> Thanks,
> Harshit
>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.138-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists