[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUpZCsR1rmIau8wv@memverge.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 10:34:34 -0500
From: Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kpageflags: respect folio head-page flag placement
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:03:53AM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2023/10/31 12:34, Gregory Price wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 09:13:44AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 07:41:23PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 11:22:18PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 02:00:05PM -0400, Gregory Price wrote:
> > > > > > kpageflags reads page-flags directly from the page, even when the
> > > > > > respective flag is only updated on the headpage of a folio.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Update bitchecks to use PAGEFLAG() interfaces to check folio for the
> > > > > > referenced, dirty, lru, active, and unevictable bits.
> > > > >
> > > > > But uptodate, writeback and reclaim (amongst others) are also defined
> > > > > only on the head page.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ah yes i was only looking at the things defined w/ PAGEFLAG defines in
> > > > page-flags.h. I'll give it full once over can collect them all, my bad.
> > > >
> > > > (also i forgot to update my commit message)
> > > >
> > > > Quick question here since i have your attention: any recommendation on
> > > > what to do for ONLY_HEAD flags? If the provided page is not the head,
> > > > should the flag report 0... or whatever the head says?
> > >
> > > Thinking about it some more, really almost all flags are per-folio, not
> > > per-page. The only exceptions are HWPoison and AnonExclusive. So
> > > probably the right way to do this is to make k = folio->flags, and
> > > then just change a few places rather than changing all the places that
> > > test 'k'.
> >
> > Funny enough that's what i originally did but was confident it was
> > correct so walked it back. I'll take another crack at it.
>
> Hi Gregory, any update?
> I changed stable_page_flags[1] when try to remove page idle wrapper,
> Matthew pointed it will conflict with this, I could redo my patch
> based on your new version:)
>
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20231103072906.2000381-5-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com/
>
> Thanks.
looks like we were noticing the same thing. I haven't done any further
work, got caught up in another project.
Matthew last pointed out:
"probably the right way to do this is to make k = folio->flags, and then
just change a few places rather than changing all the places that test
'k'."
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ZUDFSEvpxxoGWmdG@casper.infradead.org/
I took a quick look, and the only thing I'm not confident about is that
some flags are stored in the head page, and some are stored on the
second page.
/* Which page is the flag stored in */
#define FOLIO_PF_ANY 0
#define FOLIO_PF_HEAD 0
#define FOLIO_PF_ONLY_HEAD 0
#define FOLIO_PF_NO_TAIL 0
#define FOLIO_PF_NO_COMPOUND 0
#define FOLIO_PF_SECOND 1
There's only a handful, so yeah the best way is probably to go ahead and
swap k = page->flags for k = *folio_flags(folio, 0) and then handle the
couple of outliars.
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists