[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZUpgZ65SYqKVeQoo@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 16:05:59 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: arm64: fp-stress: Unable to handle kernel paging
request at virtual address
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:14:59PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 19:51, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > This all seems very surprising, especially given that AFAICT there are
> > no changes in stable-6.6-rc for arch/arm64.
> We do not see on the mainline and next.
> Is this reported problems on stable-rc 6.6 and 6.5 are due to running
> latest kselftest on older kernels ?
There's also no backports I can see in the selftests (at all, never mind
just arm64). There were a small number of selftest changes for arm64
went in during the merge window but nothing that looks super relevant.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists