[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+G9fYu=9qH+9f1bv0NqUTi-VTTzhBNUYiWjwSmrdDtuhAo69w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 22:40:07 +0530
From: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: selftests: arm64: fp-stress: Unable to handle kernel paging
request at virtual address
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 21:37, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:14:59PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 19:51, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > This all seems very surprising, especially given that AFAICT there are
> > > no changes in stable-6.6-rc for arch/arm64.
>
> > We do not see on the mainline and next.
> > Is this reported problems on stable-rc 6.6 and 6.5 are due to running
> > latest kselftest on older kernels ?
>
> There's also no backports I can see in the selftests (at all, never mind
> just arm64). There were a small number of selftest changes for arm64
> went in during the merge window but nothing that looks super relevant.
The Qemu version got updated from v8.0 to v8.1 and started getting these
test failures.
- Naresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists