linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: correct QDU1000 reg entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231108-hurricane-carefully-d9d3c1348f8c@spud>
Date:   Wed, 8 Nov 2023 12:26:13 +0000
From:   Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To:     Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: cache: qcom,llcc: correct QDU1000 reg
 entries

On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 02:25:25PM +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/7/2023 1:34 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > Qualcomm QDU1000 DTSI comes with one LLCC0 base address as pointed by
> > dtbs_check:
> > 
> >    qdu1000-idp.dtb: system-cache-controller@...00000: reg-names:2: 'llcc2_base' was expected
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Recent LLCC patches were not tested on QDU1000 thus the LLCC is there
> > broken.  This patch at least tries to bring some sense according to
> > DTSI, but I have no clue what is here correct: driver, DTS or bindings.
> > ---
> >   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
> > index 580f9a97ddf7..d610b0be262c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cache/qcom,llcc.yaml
> > @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ allOf:
> >           compatible:
> >             contains:
> >               enum:
> > +              - qcom,qdu1000-llcc
> >                 - qcom,sc7180-llcc
> >                 - qcom,sm6350-llcc
> 
> Thanks, again.
> 
> Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <quic_mojha@...cinc.com>

I'm assuming given your employer, this ack means that there is no
llcc2_base on the qdu1000.

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)