| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <e2e77da5-c344-4913-a321-4cfdcc4a3915@t-8ch.de>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:05:34 +0100
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas@...ch.de>
To: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>
Cc: avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
stanley.chu@...iatek.com, mani@...nel.org, quic_cang@...cinc.com,
quic_asutoshd@...cinc.com, beanhuo@...ron.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mikebi@...ron.com, lporzio@...ron.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Add UFS RTC support
On 2023-11-09 13:52:16+0100, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>
> The objective of this patch is to incorporate Real Time Clock (RTC) support in Universal
No need to talk about "the patch". Use imperative language.
"Add Real Time Clock (RTC) support to Universal ..."
> Flash Storage (UFS) device. This enhancement is crucial for the internal maintenance
> operations of the UFS device. The patch enables the device to handle both absolute and
> relative time information. Furthermore, it includes periodic task to update the RTC in
> accordance with the UFS specification, ensuring the accuracy of RTC information for the
> device's internal processes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Bi <mikebi@...ron.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Porzio <lporzio@...ron.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/ufs/ufs.h | 20 +++++++++
> include/ufs/ufshcd.h | 2 +
> 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 68d7da02944f..f0e3dd3dd280 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,9 @@
> /* Polling time to wait for fDeviceInit */
> #define FDEVICEINIT_COMPL_TIMEOUT 1500 /* millisecs */
>
> +/* Default RTC update every 10 seconds */
> +#define UFS_RTC_UPDATE_EVERY_MS 10*1000
(10 * MSEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> /* UFSHC 4.0 compliant HC support this mode. */
> static bool use_mcq_mode = true;
>
> @@ -677,6 +680,8 @@ static void ufshcd_device_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> hba->dev_info.wb_enabled = false;
> hba->dev_info.wb_buf_flush_enabled = false;
> }
> + if (hba->dev_info.rtc_type == UFS_RTC_RELATIVE)
> + hba->dev_info.rtc_time_baseline = 0;
> }
> if (err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> ufshcd_update_evt_hist(hba, UFS_EVT_DEV_RESET, err);
> @@ -8185,6 +8190,85 @@ static void ufs_fixup_device_setup(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> ufshcd_vops_fixup_dev_quirks(hba);
> }
>
> +static int ufshcd_update_rtc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> + int err = 0;
Initialization is not needed.
> + u32 val;
> + struct timespec64 ts64;
> +
> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts64);
> + val = ts64.tv_sec - hba->dev_info.rtc_time_baseline;
> +
> + ufshcd_rpm_get_sync(hba);
> + err = ufshcd_query_attr(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_WRITE_ATTR, QUERY_ATTR_IDN_SECONDS_PASSED,
> + 0, 0, &val);
> + ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(hba);
> +
> + if (err)
> + dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed to send rtc %d\n", __func__, err);
> + else if (hba->dev_info.rtc_type == UFS_RTC_RELATIVE)
> + hba->dev_info.rtc_time_baseline = ts64.tv_sec;
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void ufshcd_rtc_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct ufs_hba *hba;
> +
> + hba = container_of(to_delayed_work(work), struct ufs_hba, ufs_rtc_delayed_work);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> + if (hba->clk_gating.active_reqs || hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL ||
> + hba->outstanding_reqs || hba->outstanding_tasks || hba->active_uic_cmd ||
> + hba->uic_async_done) {
> + /*
> + * RTC updates should not interfere with normal IO requests; we should only update
> + * the RTC when there are no ongoing requestsUFS is not idle
> + */
Put this comment above the code it describes.
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
Weird control flow, could be:
spin_lock();
is_busy = (hb->clk_gating.active_reqs ...);
spin_unlock();
if (!is_busy)
ufshcd_update_rtc(hba);
if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba))
schedule_delayed_work();
> +
> + ufshcd_update_rtc(hba);
> +out:
> + if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba))
> + schedule_delayed_work(&hba->ufs_rtc_delayed_work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(UFS_RTC_UPDATE_EVERY_MS));
> + return;
No need for this return.
> +}
> +
> +static void ufs_init_rtc(struct ufs_hba *hba, u8 *desc_buf)
> +{
> + struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info = &hba->dev_info;
> + u16 periodic_rtc_update = get_unaligned_be16(&desc_buf[DEVICE_DESC_PARAM_FRQ_RTC]);
> +
> + if (periodic_rtc_update & BIT(9)) {
BIT(9) should get a name.
> + dev_info->rtc_type = UFS_RTC_ABSOLUTE;
> + /*
> + * The concept of measuring time in Linux as the number of seconds elapsed since
> + * 00:00:00 UTC on January 1, 1970, and UFS ABS RTC is elapsed from January 1st
> + * 2010 00:00, here we need to adjust ABS baseline.
> + */
> + dev_info->rtc_time_baseline = mktime64(2010, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0) -
> + mktime64(1970, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0);
> + } else {
> + dev_info->rtc_type = UFS_RTC_RELATIVE;
> + dev_info->rtc_time_baseline = 0;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We ignore TIME_PERIOD defined in wPeriodicRTCUpdate because Spec does not clearly
> + * define how to calculate the specific update period for each time unit. Here we simply
> + * set the update period to 1 minute by default.
> + */
> + hba->dev_info.rtc_update_period = UFS_RTC_UPDATE_EVERY_MS;
> +
> + INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&hba->ufs_rtc_delayed_work, ufshcd_rtc_work);
> +}
> +
> static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -8237,6 +8321,8 @@ static int ufs_get_device_desc(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>
> ufshcd_temp_notif_probe(hba, desc_buf);
>
> + ufs_init_rtc(hba, desc_buf);
> +
As somebody with no idea and no access to the specs:
Is this available for all devices and all protocol versions?
> if (hba->ext_iid_sup)
> ufshcd_ext_iid_probe(hba, desc_buf);
>
> @@ -8790,6 +8876,8 @@ static int ufshcd_device_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool init_dev_params)
> ufshcd_force_reset_auto_bkops(hba);
>
> ufshcd_set_timestamp_attr(hba);
> + schedule_delayed_work(&hba->ufs_rtc_delayed_work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(UFS_RTC_UPDATE_EVERY_MS));
>
> /* Gear up to HS gear if supported */
> if (hba->max_pwr_info.is_valid) {
> @@ -9746,6 +9834,8 @@ static int __ufshcd_wl_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
> ret = ufshcd_vops_suspend(hba, pm_op, POST_CHANGE);
> if (ret)
> goto set_link_active;
> +
> + cancel_delayed_work(&hba->ufs_rtc_delayed_work);
cancel_delayed_work_sync() ?
> goto out;
>
> set_link_active:
> @@ -9840,6 +9930,8 @@ static int __ufshcd_wl_resume(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
> if (ret)
> goto set_old_link_state;
> ufshcd_set_timestamp_attr(hba);
> + schedule_delayed_work(&hba->ufs_rtc_delayed_work,
> + msecs_to_jiffies(UFS_RTC_UPDATE_EVERY_MS));
> }
>
> if (ufshcd_keep_autobkops_enabled_except_suspend(hba))
> diff --git a/include/ufs/ufs.h b/include/ufs/ufs.h
> index e77ab1786856..18b39c6b3a97 100644
> --- a/include/ufs/ufs.h
> +++ b/include/ufs/ufs.h
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/bitops.h>
> #include <linux/types.h>
> #include <uapi/scsi/scsi_bsg_ufs.h>
> +#include <linux/rtc.h>
Seems unnecessary.
>
> /*
> * Using static_assert() is not allowed in UAPI header files. Hence the check
> @@ -551,6 +552,20 @@ struct ufs_vreg_info {
> struct ufs_vreg *vdd_hba;
> };
>
> +enum ufs_rtc_time {
> + UFS_RTC_RELATIVE,
> + UFS_RTC_ABSOLUTE
> +};
> +
> +enum ufs_rtc_time_unit {
> + UFS_RTC_TIME_UNIT_UNDEFINE = 0x0,
> + UFS_RTC_TIME_UNIT_MONTHS = 0x1,
> + UFS_RTC_TIME_UNIT_WEEKS = 0x2,
> + UFS_RTC_TIME_UNIT_DAYS = 0x3,
> + UFS_RTC_TIME_UNIT_HOURS = 0x4,
> + UFS_RTC_TIME_UNIT_MINUTES = 0x5
> +};
Not used.
> +
> struct ufs_dev_info {
> bool f_power_on_wp_en;
> /* Keeps information if any of the LU is power on write protected */
> @@ -578,6 +593,11 @@ struct ufs_dev_info {
>
> /* UFS EXT_IID Enable */
> bool b_ext_iid_en;
> +
> + /* UFS RTC */
> + enum ufs_rtc_time rtc_type;
> + time64_t rtc_time_baseline;
> + u32 rtc_update_period;
It's useful to append the unit to the variable name:
rtc_update_period_ms.
Also this patch is not yet reading this field anywhere.
Should only be introduced in the second patch.
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> index 7f0b2c5599cd..11da11d6870c 100644
> --- a/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> +++ b/include/ufs/ufshcd.h
> @@ -1071,6 +1071,8 @@ struct ufs_hba {
> struct ufs_hw_queue *uhq;
> struct ufs_hw_queue *dev_cmd_queue;
> struct ufshcd_mcq_opr_info_t mcq_opr[OPR_MAX];
> +
> + struct delayed_work ufs_rtc_delayed_work;
> };
>
> /**
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists