linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 06/24] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee2cd6ee-4dd5-4505-b059-b65f030a1e1e@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:42:36 -0800
From:   Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:     James Morse <james.morse@....com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
        <carl@...amperecomputing.com>, <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        <bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com>, <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
        <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
        Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, <peternewman@...gle.com>,
        <dfustini@...libre.com>, <amitsinght@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/24] x86/resctrl: Access per-rmid structures by index

Hi James,

On 10/25/2023 11:03 AM, James Morse wrote:


...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> index 0056c9962a44..fc70a2650729 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/core.c
> @@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ static void domain_remove_cpu(int cpu, struct rdt_resource *r)
>  			mbm_setup_overflow_handler(d, 0);
>  		}
>  		if (is_llc_occupancy_enabled() && cpu == d->cqm_work_cpu &&
> -		    has_busy_rmid(r, d)) {
> +		    has_busy_rmid(d)) {
>  			cancel_delayed_work(&d->cqm_limbo);
>  			cqm_setup_limbo_handler(d, 0);
>  		}
> @@ -604,7 +604,8 @@ static void clear_closid_rmid(int cpu)
>  	state->default_rmid = 0;
>  	state->cur_closid = 0;
>  	state->cur_rmid = 0;

These assignments can also use the new RESERVED defines, no?

> -	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, 0, 0);
> +	wrmsr(MSR_IA32_PQR_ASSOC, RESCTRL_RESERVED_RMID,
> +	      RESCTRL_RESERVED_CLOSID);
>  }
>  


Looks like rdtgroup_setup_default() is also a candidate to replace
hardcoded "0" for closid and rmid with the new defines.


...

> @@ -670,7 +703,7 @@ void cqm_handle_limbo(struct work_struct *work)
>  
>  	__check_limbo(d, false);
>  
> -	if (has_busy_rmid(r, d))
> +	if (has_busy_rmid(d))
>  		schedule_delayed_work_on(cpu, &d->cqm_limbo, delay);
>  

This change results in a new compile warning:

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c: In function ‘cqm_handle_limbo’:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c:805:30: warning: variable ‘r’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  805 |         struct rdt_resource *r; 


Reinette