[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8ByeKCcmd7-8Lsv5jQB-Po5UYeFRD-jB0e08BNBNUJ01UhNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:51:55 +0100
From: Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com>
To: jim.cromie@...il.com
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
Yaniv Tzoreff <yanivt@...gle.com>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>,
Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@...il.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/12] dyndbg: add trace destination field to _ddebug
sob., 4 lis 2023 o 02:39 <jim.cromie@...il.com> napisał(a):
>
> On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 7:10 AM Łukasz Bartosik <lb@...ihalf.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add trace destination field (trace_dst) to the _ddebug structure.
> > The trace destination field is used to determine output of debug
> > logs when +T is set. Setting trace_dst value to 0 (default) enables
> > output to prdbg and devdbg trace events. Setting trace_dst value to
> > a value in range of [1..255] enables output to trace instance.
>
>
> should we do some expectation setting here ?
> 255 is something of a promise to more than tom,dick,harry.
> 16-64 is more suggestive of a limited resource,
> might encourage more judicious use.
>
How about making it configurable in kernel Kconfig with default value
set to 16 or 32 ?
> will look further later
Powered by blists - more mailing lists