linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: fsl-edma: integrate TCD64 support for i.MX95

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <93f1625f-ce01-4628-91e2-e3bfd024466c@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:10:46 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Frank Li <Frank.li@....com>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        imx@...ts.linux.dev, joy.zou@....com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        peng.fan@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, shenwei.wang@....com,
        vkoul@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: fsl-edma: integrate TCD64 support for
 i.MX95

On 10/11/2023 15:59, Frank Li wrote:
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Three kbuild reports with build failures.
>>
>> I have impression this was never build-tested and reviewed internally
>> before posting. We had such talk ~month ago and I insisted on some
>> internal review prior submitting to mailing list. I did not insist on
>> internal building of patches, because it felt obvious, so please kindly
>> thoroughly build, review and test your patches internally, before using
>> the community for this. I am pretty sure NXP can build the code they send.
> 
> This build error happen at on special uncommon platform m6800. 

Indeed csky and alpha are special. Let's see if LKP will find other
platforms as well.

> Patch is tested in imx95 arm64 platform.

That's not enough. It's trivial to build test on riscv, ppc, x86_64 and
i386. Building on only one platform is not that much.

> 
> I have not machine to cover all platform.

I was able to do it as a hobbyist, on my poor laptop. What is exactly
the problem that as hobbyist I can, but NXP cannot?

Best regards,
Krzysztof