lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231112191249.srvcmay2yeewy7ql@moria.home.lan>
Date:   Sun, 12 Nov 2023 14:12:49 -0500
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To:     David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:     Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
        Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
        "linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bcachefs@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] bcachefs: remove redundant initialization of
 variable level

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 06:34:59PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> From: Kent Overstreet
> > Sent: 11 November 2023 23:39
> > 
> > On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 09:19:40PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> > > From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
> > > > Sent: 11 November 2023 21:02
> > > > > Variable level is being initialized a value that is never read, the
> > > > > variable is being re-assigned another value several statements later
> > > > > on. The initialization is redundant and can be removed. Cleans up
> > > > > clang scan build warning:
> > > > >
> > > > > fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.c:1217:11: warning: Value stored to 'level'
> > > > > during its initialization is never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> > > >
> > > > since we're no longer gnu89, we can simply declare the variable when
> > > > it's first used, like so:
> > >
> > > ugg... I think that is still frowned upon.
> > > It makes it very difficult for the average human to find
> > > the variable declaration.
> > 
> > No, it's 2023, there's no good reason to be declaring variables before
> > giving them values.
> 
> The year has nothing to do with whether it is a good idea.
> It is epically bad without -Wshadow.
> (Have you ever played 'stop the declaration' in C++, it isn't fun.)
> 
> Finding declarations is bad enough when they are at the top
> of a big block, never mind in the middle of a load of assignments.

David, I don't want you giving this kind of advice here, and if finding
declarations is something you have trouble with - perhaps find something
easier to do.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ