[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVEkJ9waaH9X11GR@google.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 11:14:47 -0800
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
"open list:BPF [GENERAL] (Safe Dynamic Programs and Tools)"
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf/tests: Remove test for MOVSX32 with offset=32
On 11/10, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
> MOVSX32 only supports sign extending 8-bit and 16-bit operands into 32
> bit operands. The "ALU_MOVSX | BPF_W" test tries to sign extend a 32 bit
> operand into a 32 bit operand which is equivalent to a normal BPF_MOV.
>
> Remove this test as it tries to run an invalid instruction.
>
> Fixes: daabb2b098e0 ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202310111838.46ff5b6a-oliver.sang@intel.com
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
(based on the fact that emit_movsx_reg doesn't handle 32 bit case under !is64)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists