lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <169990442285.3294075.7217773943260715696.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Nov 2023 19:40:22 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: core: Add option to prevent disabling
 unused regulators

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 12:24:03 +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> This may be useful for debugging and develompent purposes, when there are
> drivers that depend on regulators to be enabled but do not request them.
> 
> It is inspired from the clk_ignore_unused and pd_ignore_unused parameters,
> that are used to keep firmware-enabled clocks and power domains on even if
> these are not used by drivers.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: core: Add option to prevent disabling unused regulators
      commit: c986968fe92f20f2db26fa6bce27795b2e9ebe22

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ