[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVM203KI5D3o+ksS@chao-email>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:58:59 +0800
From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@...el.com>
To: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"Cui, Dexuan" <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 12/23] KVM: VMX: Handle FRED event data
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 12:34:02PM +0800, Li, Xin3 wrote:
>> >+ else if (is_nm_fault(intr_info) &&
>> >+ vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->xfd)
>>
>> does this necessarily mean the #NM is caused by XFD?
>
>Then the event data should be 0. Or I missed something obvious? I.e.,
>it can be easily differentiated and we should just explicitly set it
>to 0.
vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->xfd just means the guest is enabling XFD.
I don't think we can conclude that this #NM is caused by XFD only from
this. i.e., there may be some false positives.
>> >+ u64 event_data = vmcs_read64(event_data_field);
>> >+
>> >+ switch (vector) {
>> >+ case DB_VECTOR:
>> >+ get_debugreg(vcpu->arch.dr6, 6);
>> >+ WARN_ON(vcpu->arch.dr6 != (event_data ^
>> DR6_RESERVED));
>> >+ vcpu->arch.dr6 = event_data ^ DR6_RESERVED;
>> >+ break;
>> >+ case NM_VECTOR:
>> >+ if (vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.fpstate->xfd) {
>> >+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_XFD_ERR, vcpu-
>> >arch.guest_fpu.xfd_err);
>> >+ WARN_ON(vcpu-
>> >arch.guest_fpu.xfd_err != event_data);
>> >+ vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.xfd_err =
>> event_data;
>> >+ } else {
>> >+ WARN_ON(event_data != 0);
>> >+ }
>> >+ break;
>> >+ case PF_VECTOR:
>> >+ WARN_ON(vcpu->arch.cr2 != event_data);
>> >+ vcpu->arch.cr2 = event_data;
>> >+ break;
>> >+ default:
>> >+ WARN_ON(event_data != 0);
>>
>> I am not sure if this WARN_ON() can be triggeded by nested VMX. It is legitimate
>> for L1 VMM to inject any event w/ an event_data.
>>
>> FRED spec says:
>>
>> Section 5.2.1 specifies the event data that FRED event delivery of certain events
>> saves on the stack. When FRED event delivery is used for an event injected by VM
>> entry, the event data saved is the value of the injected-event-data field in the
>> VMCS. This value is used instead of what is specified in Section 5.2.1 and is done
>> for __ALL__ injected events using FRED event delivery
>
>5.2.1 Saving Information on the Regular Stack also says:
>- For any other event, the event data are not currently defined and will
> be zero until they are.
>
>Or you mean something else?
IIUC, L1 KVM can inject a nested exception whose vector isn't #DB, or #NM or
#PF with a non-zero event_data to L2. If delivering the nested exception causes a
VM-exit to L0 KVM, the assertion that event_data is always 0 for vectors other
than #DB/#NM/#PF fails.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists