linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/20] cpu/hotplug: remove CPUHP_SLAB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:12:27 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] cpu/hotplug: remove CPUHP_SLAB_PREPARE hooks

On 11/14/23 05:20, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 08:13:46PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> The CPUHP_SLAB_PREPARE hooks are only used by SLAB which is removed.
>> SLUB defines them as NULL, so we can remove those altogether.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/slab.h | 8 --------
>>  kernel/cpu.c         | 5 -----
>>  2 files changed, 13 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>> index d6d6ffeeb9a2..34e43cddc520 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -788,12 +788,4 @@ size_t kmalloc_size_roundup(size_t size);
>>  
>>  void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void);
>>  
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_SLAB)
>> -int slab_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>> -int slab_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
>> -#else
>> -#define slab_prepare_cpu	NULL
>> -#define slab_dead_cpu		NULL
>> -#endif
>> -
>>  #endif	/* _LINUX_SLAB_H */
>> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
>> index 9e4c6780adde..530b026d95a1 100644
>> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
>> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
>> @@ -2125,11 +2125,6 @@ static struct cpuhp_step cpuhp_hp_states[] = {
>>  		.startup.single		= relay_prepare_cpu,
>>  		.teardown.single	= NULL,
>>  	},
>> -	[CPUHP_SLAB_PREPARE] = {
>> -		.name			= "slab:prepare",
>> -		.startup.single		= slab_prepare_cpu,
>> -		.teardown.single	= slab_dead_cpu,
>> -	},
>>  	[CPUHP_RCUTREE_PREP] = {
>>  		.name			= "RCU/tree:prepare",
>>  		.startup.single		= rcutree_prepare_cpu,
> 
> Should CPUHP_SLAB_PREPARE be removed from the enum too?

Yep, will do, thanks!