linux-kernel - Re: sr-iov related bonding regression (two regressions in one report)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <32716.1700009673@famine>
Date:   Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:54:33 -0800
From:   Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To:     Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        Linux Intel Wired LAN <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
        Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>,
        Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
        Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Anil Choudhary <anilchabba@...il.com>
Subject: Re: sr-iov related bonding regression (two regressions in one report)

Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:

>Hi Thorsten and all,
>
>I come across LACP bonding regression on Bugzilla [1]. The reporter
>(Cc'ed) has two regressions. The first is actual LACP bonding
>regression (but terse):
>
>> Till linkx kernel 6.5.7 it is working fine, but after upgrading to 6.6.1 ping stop working with LACP bonding.
>> When we disable SR-IOV from bios , everything working fine
>
>And the second is out-of-tree module FTBFS:

[... skip OOT stuff ...]

>
>Should I add the first regression to regzbot (since the second one
>is obviously out-of-tree problem), or should I asked detailed regression
>info to the reporter?

	My vote is to get additional information.  Given the nature of
the workaround ("When we disable SR-IOV from bios , everything working
fine"), it's plausible that the underlying cause is something
platform-specific.

	Interestingly, we've been chasing internally an issue with
bonding LACP mode on ice (E810-XXV, I think) when running on the Ubuntu
kernel.  That manifests as occasional TX timeouts, and doesn't happen if
the Intel OOT driver is used, so I wonder if that bugzilla reporter is
also seeing TX timeouts that correlate with their ping failures.

	-J

>Thanks.
>
>[1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218139
>
>-- 
>An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

---
	-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com