[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SA1PR11MB67348D3637C2BC6B107C5CCAA8B1A@SA1PR11MB6734.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 03:03:01 +0000
From: "Li, Xin3" <xin3.li@...el.com>
To: "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>
CC: "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"kys@...rosoft.com" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"haiyangz@...rosoft.com" <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"wei.liu@...nel.org" <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"Cui, Dexuan" <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"vkuznets@...hat.com" <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 13/23] KVM: VMX: Handle VMX nested exception for FRED
> >+ if (idt_vectoring_info & VECTORING_INFO_DELIVER_CODE_MASK)
> >+ kvm_requeue_exception_e(vcpu, vector,
> vmcs_read32(error_code_field),
> >+ idt_vectoring_info &
> INTR_INFO_NESTED_EXCEPTION_MASK);
> >+ else
> >+ kvm_requeue_exception(vcpu, vector,
> >+ idt_vectoring_info &
> INTR_INFO_NESTED_EXCEPTION_MASK);
>
> Exiting-event identification can also have bit 13 set, indicating a nested
> exception encountered and caused VM-exit. when reinjecting the exception to
> guests, kvm needs to set the "nested" bit, right? I suspect some changes
> to e.g., handle_exception_nmi() are needed.
The current patch relies on kvm_multiple_exception() to do that. But TBH,
I'm not sure it can recognize all nested cases. I probably should revisit
it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists