linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] i2c: designware: Fix PM calls order in dw_i2c_plat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZVTMJA5JsQI13dhz@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:48:20 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
        Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] i2c: designware: Fix PM calls order in
 dw_i2c_plat_probe()

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 01:14:36PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 11/10/23 20:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > We should not mix managed calls with non-managed. This will break
> > the calls order at the error path and ->remove() stages. Fix this
> > by wrapping PM ops to become managed one.
> > 
> > Fixes: 36d48fb5766a ("i2c: designware-platdrv: enable RuntimePM before registering to the core")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> I fail to see what was broken in above commit and how this patch fixes it?

The order of the unwiding probed flow is broken now as devm_*() mixed with
non-devm_*() calls. This makes all non-devm_*() calls that interleave devm_*()
ones to be also devm_*()-wrapped.

...

> Is it intended change the reset isn't asserted after this patch in case
> i2c_dw_probe() fails?

Did you miss that this is become managed with this patch and hence the above
is false scenario?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko