[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVTM2UgTMgNIBWGA@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:51:21 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Dabros <jsd@...ihalf.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/25] i2c: designware: Fix PM calls order in
dw_i2c_plat_probe()
On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 03:48:20PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 01:14:36PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 11/10/23 20:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> > Is it intended change the reset isn't asserted after this patch in case
> > i2c_dw_probe() fails?
>
> Did you miss that this is become managed with this patch and hence the above
> is false scenario?
Ah, I see now what you mean. Sorry, I though about next patch in mind.
Indeed, I need to amend this one.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists