[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04d4d38c-9130-4749-9ef8-569528939147@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:39:14 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/244] 5.15.139-rc1 review
On 11/15/23 12:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.139 release.
> There are 244 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:34:45 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 160 pass: 158 fail: 2
Failed builds:
i386:tools/perf
x86_64:tools/perf
Qemu test results:
total: 509 pass: 509 fail: 0
Sam perf build failure as reported by others. Note that I see the
same problem in the v5.10.y release candidate.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists