linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/244] 5.15.139-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:35:39 -0800
From:   Allen Pais <stable.kernel.dev@...il.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/244] 5.15.139-rc1 review

> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.139 release.
> > There are 244 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:34:45 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> Build results:
>         total: 160 pass: 158 fail: 2
> Failed builds:
>         i386:tools/perf
>         x86_64:tools/perf
> Qemu test results:
>         total: 509 pass: 509 fail: 0
>
> Sam perf build failure as reported by others. Note that I see the
> same problem in the v5.10.y release candidate.
>

Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or
regressions.

Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@...ux.microsoft.com>

Thanks.