[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZVfA2Z8XyD3qtTMZ@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 19:36:57 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, steven.price@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ryan.roberts@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.com,
shy828301@...il.com, v-songbaohua@...o.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com, xiang@...nel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
yuzhao@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V3 PATCH] arm64: mm: swap: save and restore mte tags for
large folios
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 07:47:00AM +0800, Barry Song wrote:
> This has been discussed. Steven, Ryan and I all don't think this is a good
> option. in case we have a large folio with 16 basepages, as do_swap_page
> can only map one base page for each page fault, that means we have
> to restore 16(tags we restore in each page fault) * 16(the times of page faults)
> for this large folio.
That doesn't seem all that hard to fix? Call set_ptes() instead of
set_pte_at(). The biggest thing, I guess, is making sure that all
the PTEs you're going to set up are still pte_none().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists